<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Personally Challenging &#187; Windows Sucks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mytech.fywservices.com/category/windows-sucks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mytech.fywservices.com</link>
	<description>Technology should not be</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 11:53:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Word 2003 Address Bug</title>
		<link>http://mytech.fywservices.com/2010/03/word-2003-address-bug/</link>
		<comments>http://mytech.fywservices.com/2010/03/word-2003-address-bug/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 11:53:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Windows Sucks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[address printing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[envelope printing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[label printing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft Word]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[word]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mytech.fywservices.com/?p=66</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It seems the boys* in Redmond are furthering their Borg reputation. I&#8217;ve been wondering for a few weeks why  I can&#8217;t look up addresses from my Outlook contact list for printing envelopes since I upgraded to Office 2003.  Since I do my mailing early on Sunday mornings, I&#8217;m not as caffeinated as necessary for technical [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems the boys* in Redmond are furthering their Borg reputation.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been wondering for a few weeks why  I can&#8217;t look up addresses from my Outlook contact list for printing envelopes since I upgraded to Office 2003.  Since I do my mailing early on Sunday mornings, I&#8217;m not as caffeinated as necessary for technical thinking, so I was shrugging it off to another of the many features meant to make customers miserable.</p>
<p>This morning I had just barely enough cognition to notice that when looking up addresses, it would only show email addresses. So I went to the address in Outlook I wanted to print and added an email address of microsoft@sucks.it to the person I wanted to send snail mail to. And, of course, it worked.</p>
<p>So, according to the Microsoft Office development team it appears that if you do not have an email address, you don&#8217;t exist.</p>
<p><em>*Yes, I know there are female MS employees, too, but referring to them would have killed the pun.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mytech.fywservices.com/2010/03/word-2003-address-bug/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vista Mail Profiles Suck</title>
		<link>http://mytech.fywservices.com/2009/12/vista-mail-profiles-suck/</link>
		<comments>http://mytech.fywservices.com/2009/12/vista-mail-profiles-suck/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 14:32:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Windows Sucks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mail profiles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vista]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mytech.fywservices.com/?p=45</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At least, if you have a 64 bit machine. Found the answer to how to get around this buggy feature at http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en/exchangesvrclients/thread/791aa00d-6e2c-43c9-9e7b-a57aeb71ada9: In Vista 64, I just found an icon &#8220;View 32-bit Control Panel Icons&#8221; in Control Panel. And than I found &#8220;Mail&#8221; inside.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At least, if you have a 64 bit machine. Found the answer to how to get around this buggy feature at <a href="http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en/exchangesvrclients/thread/791aa00d-6e2c-43c9-9e7b-a57aeb71ada9" target="_blank">http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en/exchangesvrclients/thread/791aa00d-6e2c-43c9-9e7b-a57aeb71ada9</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>In Vista 64, I just found an icon &#8220;View 32-bit Control Panel Icons&#8221; in Control Panel. And than I found &#8220;Mail&#8221; inside.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mytech.fywservices.com/2009/12/vista-mail-profiles-suck/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vista File Security Sucks</title>
		<link>http://mytech.fywservices.com/2009/12/vista-file-security-sucks/</link>
		<comments>http://mytech.fywservices.com/2009/12/vista-file-security-sucks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 13:58:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Windows Sucks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mytech.fywservices.com/?p=41</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I used RoboForm to copy file from my old hard drive to the new one after a rebuild. Problem is, I used the short option which also copied file security. Since I renamed the machine during the rebuild, I was not me anymore. I found the fix for individual files and folders at http://paulstamatiou.com/how-to-quickie-vista-permissions I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used RoboForm to copy file from my old hard drive to the new one after a rebuild. Problem is, I used the short option which also copied file security. Since I renamed the machine during the rebuild, I was not me anymore. I found the fix for individual files and folders at <a href="http://paulstamatiou.com/how-to-quickie-vista-permissions" target="_blank">http://paulstamatiou.com/how-to-quickie-vista-permissions</a></p>
<p>I found a batch approach at <a href="http://www.mydigitallife.info/2007/05/25/easier-way-to-take-ownership-and-grant-access-files-or-directories-in-vista/" target="_blank">http://www.mydigitallife.info/2007/05/25/easier-way-to-take-ownership-and-grant-access-files-or-directories-in-vista/</a>, but it is not for the newbie. There was another offering that does not require an account at <a href="http://www.cynosurex.com/Software/TakeControl/" target="_blank">http://www.cynosurex.com/Software/TakeControl/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mytech.fywservices.com/2009/12/vista-file-security-sucks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vista Disk Usage Sucks</title>
		<link>http://mytech.fywservices.com/2009/10/vista-disk-usage-sucks/</link>
		<comments>http://mytech.fywservices.com/2009/10/vista-disk-usage-sucks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 20:11:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Windows Sucks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mytech.fywservices.com/?p=37</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I stole the following tip from Delete All But The Most Recent Restore Point In Vista: System Restore is a handy feature but it can take up several gigabytes of hard drive space. You can reclaim the space but disabling System Restore, however, by doing so, you will not be able to restore your computer [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I stole the following tip from <a style="text-decoration: none;" title="Permanent Link to Delete All But The Most Recent Restore Point In Vista" rel="bookmark" href="http://www.lockergnome.com/windows/2008/06/25/delete-all-but-the-most-recent-restore-point-in-vista/" target="_blank">Delete All But The Most Recent Restore Point In Vista</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>System Restore is a handy feature but it can take up several gigabytes of hard drive space. You can reclaim the space but disabling System Restore, however, by doing so, you will not be able to restore your <a id="KonaLink0" style="text-decoration: underline ! important; position: static;" href="http://www.lockergnome.com/windows/2008/06/25/delete-all-but-the-most-recent-restore-point-in-vista/#" target="undefined"><span style="color: blue ! important; font-weight: 400; font-size: 12px; position: static;"><span style="color: blue ! important; font-family: Lucida Grande,Arial,Verdana,sans-serif; font-weight: 400; font-size: 12px; position: static;">computer</span></span></a> to a given point in time.</p>
<p>An alternative, or happy medium, is to delete all the restore points, except the most recent one. To accomplish this in Vista:</p>
<ol>
<li>Click Start, All Programs, Accessories, System Tools, and click <a id="KonaLink1" style="text-decoration: underline ! important; position: static;" href="http://www.lockergnome.com/windows/2008/06/25/delete-all-but-the-most-recent-restore-point-in-vista/#" target="undefined"><span style="color: blue ! important; font-weight: 400; font-size: 12px; position: static;"><span style="border-bottom: 1px solid blue; color: blue ! important; font-family: Lucida Grande,Arial,Verdana,sans-serif; font-weight: 400; font-size: 12px; position: static; background-color: transparent;">Disk </span><span style="border-bottom: 1px solid blue; color: blue ! important; font-family: Lucida Grande,Arial,Verdana,sans-serif; font-weight: 400; font-size: 12px; position: static; background-color: transparent;">Cleanup</span></span></a>.</li>
<li>Click Files from all users on this computer.</li>
<li>If prompted, click OK.</li>
<li>From the <a id="KonaLink2" style="text-decoration: underline ! important; position: static;" href="http://www.lockergnome.com/windows/2008/06/25/delete-all-but-the-most-recent-restore-point-in-vista/#" target="undefined"><span style="color: blue ! important; font-weight: 400; font-size: 12px; position: static;"><span style="color: blue ! important; font-family: Lucida Grande,Arial,Verdana,sans-serif; font-weight: 400; font-size: 12px; position: static;">dialog </span><span style="color: blue ! important; font-family: Lucida Grande,Arial,Verdana,sans-serif; font-weight: 400; font-size: 12px; position: static;">box</span></span></a> that appears, click the More Options tab.</li>
<li>From the System Restore and Shadow Copies section, click Clean up.</li>
<li>When prompted, click Delete.</li>
</ol>
<li>Click OK.</li>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mytech.fywservices.com/2009/10/vista-disk-usage-sucks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vista Folders Suck</title>
		<link>http://mytech.fywservices.com/2009/10/vista-folders-suck/</link>
		<comments>http://mytech.fywservices.com/2009/10/vista-folders-suck/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 20:04:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Windows Sucks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mytech.fywservices.com/?p=34</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Will see if this works soon: Change Vista Default Folder View / Make Folders Same]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will see if this works soon:</p>
<h2><a title="Change Vista Default Folder View / Make Folders Same" href="http://www.geekydrunk.com/2008/01/10/change-vista-default-folder-view-make-folders-same/">Change Vista Default Folder View / Make Folders Same</a></h2>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mytech.fywservices.com/2009/10/vista-folders-suck/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why is trustedinstaller.exe Using Up All My CPU Cycles?</title>
		<link>http://mytech.fywservices.com/2009/10/why-is-trustedinstaller-exe-using-up-all-my-cpu-cycles/</link>
		<comments>http://mytech.fywservices.com/2009/10/why-is-trustedinstaller-exe-using-up-all-my-cpu-cycles/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 19:41:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Windows Sucks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mytech.fywservices.com/?p=32</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Covered very well at http://www.technologyquestions.com/technology/windows-vista/63396-trustedinstaller-exe.html, I will quote the best post in case the URL changes: Re: TrustedInstaller.exe This became a lot longer than I expected so if you want the short answer without how I figured this out, scroll to the bottom. Long Answer So I think I&#8217;ve devised a solution to this problem. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Covered very well at <a href="http://www.technologyquestions.com/technology/windows-vista/63396-trustedinstaller-exe.html" target="_blank">http://www.technologyquestions.com/technology/windows-vista/63396-trustedinstaller-exe.html</a>, I will quote the best post in case the URL changes:</p>
<table id="post848499" border="0" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="6" width="100%" align="center">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td id="td_post_848499">
<blockquote>
<div><strong><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Re: TrustedInstaller.exe<!-- google_ad_section_end --></strong></div>
<hr style="color: #d1d1e1;" size="1" />
<div id="post_message_848499"><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
This became a lot longer than I expected so if you want the short answer<br />
without how I figured this out, scroll to the bottom.</p>
<p>Long Answer</p>
<p>So I think I&#8217;ve devised a solution to this problem.</p>
<p>First, some background on what TrustedInstaller is.</p>
<p>Essentially, TrustedInstaller.exe is this kind of third-party master<br />
&#8220;administrator&#8221; which holds the rights to certain files/applications<br />
that the OS deems to be essential. Windows basically gives<br />
TrustedInstaller carte blanche to do whatever it wants &#8212; use as much<br />
CPU, RAM as it wants. This is because if TrustedInstaller.exe has<br />
allowed a certain application (let&#8217;s call it Program X) to perform a<br />
given task, then Windows essentailly &#8220;trusts&#8221; that Program X is an<br />
essential system resource &#8212; because it is running under the purview of<br />
TrustedInstaller. (Hence the strange, spyware-esque name of<br />
TrustedInstaller.) And since Program X is an &#8220;essential&#8221; and &#8220;trusted&#8221;<br />
system resource, Windows will make sure to give it all the CPU time it<br />
needs.</p>
<p>I found the MSDN blog post found at<br />
[url]http://blogs.msdn.com/irenak/archive/2007/01/30/sysk-277-how-to-bring-back-the-trustedinstaller.aspx[/url]<br />
to be particularly insightful on what TrustedInstaller actually does.</p>
<p>Anyway, on to the solution.</p>
<p>So, I would be trying to watch a movie in windows media player when all<br />
of a sudden the movie stutters and skips and TrustedInstaller is using<br />
like 90% CPU, can&#8217;t end task, lowering task priority does nothing. And<br />
if i closed wmplayer, TrustedInstaller would go away. After looking<br />
around on some forums I learned that TrustedInstaller has something to<br />
do with the new Integrated Windows Update feature in Vista. So I tried<br />
to deactivate Windows Update but that did nothing. Then I realized,<br />
TrustedInstaller.exe (in my particular case) is only hogging ridiculous<br />
amoutns of resources when I use programs that depend on a certain codec<br />
(ffdshow) that I had been having problems with earlier and which Vista<br />
logged in its &#8220;Problem Reports and Solutions&#8221; service. I then realized,<br />
Windows is continuously checking for &#8220;updates&#8221; or &#8220;new solutions&#8221; to the<br />
ffdshow problem I used to have because I had not yet removed the entry<br />
for the codec problem in the Problem Reports and Solutions control<br />
panel. So, removing all of these entries should result in Problem<br />
Reports and Solutions stopping its requests on the Windows Update<br />
service, which will then stop its requests to TrustedInstaller to take<br />
up massive amounts of system resources.</p>
<p>Short Answer</p>
<p>Do the following:<br />
Start &gt; Control Panel &gt; Classic View &gt; Problem Reports and Solutions &gt;<br />
Clear Solution and Problem History &gt; (Confirm that you want to clear<br />
the history) &gt; Close the control panel</p>
<p>Caveat: The thing is, this assumes that Problem Reports and Solutions<br />
is the root cause of your particular TrustedInstaller using up all<br />
these resources. If there is something else that is making calls on<br />
TrustedInstaller (which it very well could be as TrustedInstaller<br />
serves as a central hub for what Vista deems mission-critical requests)<br />
- then you will have to diagnose your unique problem.</p>
<p>&#8211;<br />
naurnah<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<br />
naurnah&#8217;s Profile: [url]http://forums.techarena.in/member.php?userid=38347[/url]<br />
View this thread: [url]http://forums.techarena.in/showthread.php?t=713497[/url]</p>
<p>[url]http://forums.techarena.in[/url]</p></div>
</blockquote>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mytech.fywservices.com/2009/10/why-is-trustedinstaller-exe-using-up-all-my-cpu-cycles/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
